Challenges in the long term use of dual or triple antiplatelet therapy
Objectives
• Understand differences between P2Y
12 oral inhibitors
• Understand differences in DAPT duration after PCI based on stent
type
• Recognize influence on DAPT duration based on stable or acute
presentation
• Understand DAPT score
• Understand risk / benefit ratio on deciding duration of therapy
• Issues related to triple therapy
• Aspirin hypersensitivity
• Bioabsorbable vascular scaffold
Challenges in the Long Term Use of Dual or Triple Antiplatelet Therapy Kwan S Lee MD FSCAI FACC Associate Professor of Medicine Sarver Heart Center University of Arizona Relevant Disclosures None Objectives • Understand differences between P2Y12 oral inhibitors • Understand differences in DAPT duration after PCI based on stent type • Recognize influence on DAPT duration based on stable or acute presentation • Understand DAPT score • Understand risk / benefit ratio on deciding duration of therapy • Issues related to triple therapy • Aspirin hypersensitivity • Bioabsorbable vascular scaffold Effects of Anti-Platelets Post PCI • Decrease risk of stent thrombosis – STEMI – NSTEMI • Prevention of ischemic events remote from stented area – Acute coronary syndrome – Ischemic stroke – Death • Increased risk of bleeding Which Drugs? • Aspirin at 75 – 100 (81 mg), continued indefinitely • In addition to 1 oral P2Y12 inhibitor – Clopidogrel (Plavix) 75 mg once daily – Prasugrel (Effient) 10 mg once daily or 5 mg once daily (patients <60 kg) – Ticagrelor (Brilinta) 90 mg twice daily within the 1st year after PCI or 60 mg twice daily after the first year Vorapaxar • PAR-1 inhibitor, high-affinity, selectively inhibits thrombin, inhibiting platelet aggregation • FDA approved for CV MACE in patients with previous MI or PAD • Contraindicated in patients with stroke • Used only in conjunction with aspirin and / or clopidogrel • Increases TIMI major / minor, not intracranial bleeding vs placebo • > 4 week offset General Guidelines • DAPT Therapy – aspirin dose of 81 mg (range 75 mg to 100 mg recommended) • Reasonable to use ticagrelor over clopidogrel in ACS PCI patients (IIa-BR) • Reasonable to use prasugrel over clopidogrel in ACS PCI patients (IIa-BR) – No high risk of bleeding – NO HISTORY OF STROKE OR TIA (III-BR) DRUG CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL TICAGRELOR Class Thienopyridine Thienopyridine CTPT Pro / Direct Drug Prodrug Prodrug Direct Inhibition Irreversible Irreversible Reversible Metabolic Pathway Hepatic CYP P450 Intestine/hepati c CYP P450 Hepatic CYP P34/5 Conversion to active metabolite 15% 85% 90-100% Time to steady state inhibition 8 hours post 600 mg 1-2 hours post 60 mg 2 hours post 180 mg Level of inhibition at steady state Wide response in variability Predictable Predictable Pharmacodynamic offset 5-7 days Up to 9 days 5-7 days Off target effects None significant None significant Inhibition of adenosine reuptake (dyspnea, bradycardia) Activation Pathways Schomig A; N Eng J Med 2009 Special Issues • Routine use of platelet function testing and / or genetic testing is not recommended (Class III: no benefit) • Switching oral P2Y12 inhibitors has not been studied for clinical outcome • Proton pump inhibitors theoretically interfere with clopidogrel but does not appear to be clinically significant • PPIs should be used with prior GI bleeding (Class 1) and reasonable for primary prophylaxis in high risk patients (Class IIa) Aspirin Hypersensitivity • No regimen excluding aspirin post PCI has been formally tested • Aspirin desensitization is preferred, supervised by allergist in an ICU setting • Rapid desensitization protocols • ACC recommends single oral P2Y12 antiplatelet therapy – clopidogrel / prasugrel / ticagrelor (Class 1, LOE B and C) • Do not use dual oral P2Y12 therapy • ACCP recommends considering cilostazol in place of aspirin (*contraindicated in CHF) • Dipyridamole not recommended as has been shown to not be effective in ACS • Potential role of vorapaxar unknown How Long? – Determine if BMS, DES or BVS – Categorize Indication for PCI into Stable Ischemic Heart Disease or Acute Coronary Syndrome – Evaluate Bleeding Risk – Is indication for triple therapy present? Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffold ABSORB III vs. EES DEFINITE / PROBABLE STENT THROMBOSIS ABSORB EES P value Composite 1.5 % 0.7% 0.13 Early: 0-30 days 1.1 % 0.7% 0.46 Acute <24 h 0.2 % 0.6% 0.19 Subacute >24 h to 30 days 0.9 % 0.1% 0.04 Late 31 days to 1 year 0.5 % 0% 0.10 Definite 1.4 % 0.7% 0.21 Probable 0.2% 0% 0.55 Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Post PCI • In addition to 75-100 mg (81 mg) of aspirin (1-BNR) • Bare Metal Stent – At least 1 month of clopidogrel (1-A) – >1 month may be reasonable if low bleeding risk & no events on DAPT (2b-A) • Drug Eluting Stent – At least 6 months of clopidogrel (1-BR) – > 6 months may be reasonable if low bleeding risk & no events on DAPT (2b-A) – If bleeding or risk high, may discontinue after 3 months (2b-C-LD) • Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffold – At least 12 months of clopidogrel / prasugrel or ticagrelor Acute Coronary Syndrome Post PCI • In addition to 75-100 mg (81 mg) of aspirin (1-BNR) • With either BMS, DES or BVS • At least 12 months of clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor (1-BR) • >12 months may be reasonable if low bleeding risk & no events on DAPT (IIb-A) • With BMS or DES, if bleeding or high risk may discontinue after 6 months (IIb-C-LD) Factor Favoring Longer Duration DAPT (Increased Ischemic or Stent Thrombosis Risk) • Ischemic Events – Advanced Age – ACS Presentation – Multiple prior MI – Extensive CAD – Diabetes Mellitus – CKD • Stent Thrombosis – ACS Presentation – Diabetes Mellitus – LVEF <40% – 1st Generation DES (Cypher / Taxus) – Stent under-sizing / under-deployment – Small stents ( example 2.25, 2.5 mm) – Long stents ( example > 20 mm in length ) – Bifurcations stents – In-stent restenosis Factors Favoring Shorter Duration DAPT (Increased Bleeding Risk) • Prior bleeding • Oral anticoagulant therapy • Females • Advanced age • Low body weight • CKD • Diabetes mellitus • Anemia • Chronic steroid or NSAID therapy Discussion at 12 months • If no bleeding or cost issues • Consider DAPT score to decide continuation of thienopyridine up to 30 months post PCI • Note DAPT study did not include ticagrelor • Ticagrelor beyond 1 year studied in PEGASUS TIMI-54 suggesting preference for 60 mg PO bid dose The DAPT Trial – 12 vs. 30 months post DES Mauri L et al. N Eng J Med 2014 Moderate or Severe bleeding 2.5% vs 1.6% with thienopyridine Yeh RW et al.JAMA 2016 Low Risk Score = 2 The DAPT Score DAPT SCORE • Score 2 or above prolonged DAPT favorable benefit / risk • Score <2 prolonged DAPT unfavorable benefit / risk Variable Points Age >75 y -2 Age 65– 75 y -1 Age <65 y 0 Current tobacco 1 Diabetes mellitus 1 MI at presentation 1 Prior PCI or prior MI 1 Stent diameter <3 mm 1 Paclitaxel-eluting stent 1 CHF or LVEF <30% 2 SVG PCI 2 Long Term Ticagrelor, PEGASUS TIMI-54 Patients 1-3 years after MI 80% underwent PCI Ticagrelor 60 mg equivalent to 90 mg in MACE reduction up to study duration of 3 years TIMI Major bleeding increased without increased rate of fatal bleeding or intrcranial hemorrhage - 2.6% vs. 2.3% vs 1.1% Bonaca MP et al. N Eng J Med 2015 Triple Therapy (DAPT + Anticoagulant) • 2-3 x increased bleeding • Assess ischemic and bleeding risks (HAS-BLED) • Duration as short as possible • Clopidogrel is drug of choice • Dual therapy (no aspirin) may be considered • Consider INR 2.0-2.5 • No NOAC data, Warfarin is preferred • Paradigm may change as reversal agents are approved • PPIs should be used for bleeding prophylaxis in high risk GI bleeding patients Conclusions • DAPT therapy post PCI decreases stent thrombosis & CV MACE • DAPT therapy increases bleeding, especially with other agents • Multiple permutations are possible with complex differences • Risk of stent thrombosis decreases with time post PCI and is dependent on the type of stent • Multiple DAPT duration options are now available – 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and up to 30 months post PCI • Scoring systems are now available for DAPT duration decisions Thank You Thank You
File đính kèm:
- challenges_in_the_long_term_use_of_dual_or_triple_antiplatel.pdf