Can thiệp cấp cứu động mạch vành: Lựa chọn stent trần hay stent phủ thuốc - Nguyễn Cửu Lợi
Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial
Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation [PASSION]
Randomly assigned 619 patients presenting with STEMI to a
paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) or the similar BMS.
• The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death,
recurrent myocardial infarction, or TLR.
• Follow-up at 5 years.
Can thiệp cấp cứu động mạch vành: lựa chọn stent trần hay stent phủ thuốc ------------------ TS. Nguyễn Cửu Lợi Trung tâm Tim mạch – Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế Maarten A. Vink, Maurits T. Dirksen, Maarten J. Suttorp, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Jeroen van Etten, Mark S. Patterson, Ton Slagboom, Ferdinand Kiemeneij, Gerrit J. Laarman. • Randomly assigned 619 patients presenting with STEMI to a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) or the similar BMS. • The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or TLR. • Follow-up at 5 years. Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation [PASSION] Conclusions In the present analysis of PES compared with BMS in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI: - No significant difference in major adverse cardiac events was observed. - In addition, no difference in the incidence of definite or probable ST was seen, although very late ST was almost exclusively seen after the use of PES. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011;4:24–9 Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation [PASSION] Ev en ts % - 3980 (63.2%) DES (99% PES & SES) - 2318 (36.8%) BMS Bindu Kalesan, Thomas Pilgrim, Katja Heinimann, Lorenz Räber, Giulio G. Stefanini, Marco Valgimigli, Bruno R. da Costa, François Mach, Thomas F. Lüscher, Bernhard Meier, Stephan Windecker, Peter Jüni Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (15 RCT) 2012 Apr;33(8):977-87 Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (cont’) Overall Year 1 Subsequent year Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (cont’) Overall Year 1 Subsequent year Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (cont’) Bindu Kalesan, Thomas Pilgrim, Katja Heinimann, Lorenz Räber, Giulio G. Stefanini, Marco Valgimigli, Bruno R. da Costa, François Mach, Thomas F. Lüscher, Bernhard Meier, Stephan Windecker, Peter Jüni CONCLUSION An early benefit of early generation DES in primary PCI for STEMI with a reduction in TVR and a trend towards less definite ST is offset in subsequent years by an increased risk of very late ST. Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (cont’) Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Alexandra J. Lansky, M.D., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., Bernard J. Gersh, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., George Dangas, M.D., Ph.D., S. Chiu Wong, M.D., Bernhard Witzenbichler, M.D., Giulio Guagliumi, M.D., Jan Z. Peruga, M.D., Bruce R. Brodie, M.D., Dariusz Dudek, M.D., Martin Möckel, M.D., Andrzej Ochala, M.D., Alison Kellock, B.S., Helen Parise, Sc.D., and Roxana Mehran, M.D. for the HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators Stone GW et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1946-1959. Kaplan–Meier Time-to-Event Curves for Primary End Points and Three Components of the Primary Composite Safety End Point. HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P=0.002 HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.36; P=0.01 HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.32; P=0.83 HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.47; P=0.77 Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Seven Randomized Trials Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(04):354-64 Raisuke Iijimaa, Robert A Byrnea, Alban Dibraa, Gjin Ndrepepaa, Christian Spauldingb, Gerrit J Laarmanc, Maurizio Menichellid, Marco Valgimiglie, Emilio Di Lorenzof, Christoph Kaiserg, Ilkka Tieralah, Julinda Mehillia, Maarten J Suttorpi, Roberto Violinid, Albert Schömiga, Adnan Kastratia Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Seven Randomized Trials Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(04):354-64 Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Seven Randomized Trials Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(04):354-64 Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Seven Randomized Trials Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(04):354-64 Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Seven Randomized Trials Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(04):354-64 CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, use of DES in diabetic patients undergoing primary stenting for STEMI reduces the need for repeat intervention without increasing the rate of thrombosis-related events as compared to BMS. HỘI NGHỊ TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP 26-27/03/2016 -- TP Huế --
File đính kèm:
- can_thiep_cap_cuu_dong_mach_vanh_lua_chon_stent_tran_hay_ste.pdf