Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến việc áp dụng kế toán giá trị hợp lý theo chuẩn quốc tế - Lược khảo các nghiên cứu
Báo cáo tài chính (BCTC) công bố theo giá trị hợp lý (GTHL) cung
cấp cho nhà đầu tư nhiều thông tin hơn khi các tài sản được công bố
theo giá trị thực của nó. Điều này giúp BCTC trở nên minh bạch hơn
với nhà đầu tư. Các nghiên cứu và thống kê đều chỉ ra rằng, những
nước có thị trường vốn càng phát triển thì việc công bố thông tin
theo GTHL càng phổ biến. Rủi ro cao liên quan đến hoạt động của
ngân hàng và các tổ chức tài chính đòi hỏi các tổ chức phải chấp
nhận các quy định nghiêm ngặt, do đó, cũng làm cho ngành này sớm
chú ý đến GTHL hơn. Bài viết rà soát các nghiên cứu về các nhân tố
ảnh hưởng đến việc áp dụng kế toán theo GTHL, bao gồm môi trường
kinh tế, môi trường pháp lý và thuế, môi trường nghề nghiệp, môi
trường kinh doanh, môi trường quốc tế và môi trường văn hóa. Bài
viết có thể được sử dụng để xây dựng mô hình nghiên cứu cụ thể tại
từng vùng cũng như hỗ trợ chính phủ các nước đang trong quá trình
triển khai báo cáo theo chuẩn quốc tế.
anian environment: The perspective of accountants, auditors and academicians ‘an exploratory study’. International Conference on Business Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities in the 21st Century. 10. Al-Shiab, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of International Financial Reporting Standards adoption on cost of equity capital: a vector error correction model. International Journal of business, 13(3), 271-298. 11. Archambault, J. J., and Archambault, M. E. (2003). A multinational test of determinants of corporate disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 38, 173–194. 12. Ashraf, J., and Ghani, W. I. (2005). Accounting development in Pakistan. The International Journal of Accounting, 40, 175–201. 13. Askary, S. (2006b). Accounting professionalism– a cultural perspective of developing countries. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 102-111. 14. Barth, M.E. & Clinch G. (1999). Revalued financial, tangible and intangible assets: associations with share prices and non- market-based value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 199-232 15. Blake, J., Akerfeldt, K. & Gowthorpe, C. (1998) “The relationship between tax and accounting rules – the Swedish case”, European Business Review, 97(2), 85-91 16. Blake, J., Amat, O., Gowthorpe C. & Pilkington C. (1997) “International accounting harmonization – a comparison of Spain, Sweden and Austria”, European Business Review, 98(3), 144-150 17. Chamisa, E. E. (2000). The relevance and observance of the IASC standards in developing countries and the particular case of Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 35(2), 267-286. 18. Chand, P., and Patel, C. (2008). Convergence and harmonization of accounting standards in the South Pacific region. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 24, 83–92. 19. Chen, S., Sun, Z., and Wang, Y. (2002). Evidence from China on whether harmonized accounting standards harmonize accounting practices. Accounting Horizons, 16(3), 183-197. 20. Dahawy, K. (2009). Company characteristics and disclosure level: the case of Egypt. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 34, 194-208. 21. Deaconu, A., & Buiga, A. (2011). Accounting and the Environmental Factors-an Empirical Investigation in Post-Communist Romania. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 10(2), 135-168. 22. Demaria, S., & Dufour, D. (2007). First time adoption of IFRS, Fair value option, Conservatism: Evidences from French listed companies. In 30 ème colloque de l’EAA, 1-24. 23. Easton P.D., Eddey, P.H. & Harris T.S. (1993). An Investigation of Revaluations of Tangible Long Lived Assets. Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 1993, 1-38 24. El-Gazzar, S. M., Finn, P. M., and Jacob, R., (1999). An empirical investigation of multinational firms’ compliance with International Accounting Standards, The International Journal of Accounting, 34(2), 239-248. 25. Elsayed, M. A., and Hoque, Z. (2010). Perceived international environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study. The British Accounting Review, 42, 17–35. 26. Floropoulos, I. (2006). IFRS- First time users: some empirical evidence from Greek companies. SPOUDAI, 56(3), 39-70. 27. Francis, J., Schipper, K. & Vincent, L. (2002). Earnings announcements and competing information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 313-342 28. Gordon, E.A. (2008). Sustainability in global financial reporting and innovation in institutions. Accounting Research Journal, 21(3), 231-38 29. Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. ABACUS, 24, 1-15. 30. Haniffa, R. M., and Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349. 31. Hofstede G. (1980).Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Bevarly HILLS, CA: Sage. 32. Hofstede G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75-89. 33. Hopwood, W. & Schaefer T. (1989). Firm-specific responsiveness to input price changes and the incremental information in current cost income”, The Accounting Review, 64, 313-328 34. Hofstede G. (1984). Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning. Asian and Pacific Journal of Management, 83-84. 35. Hung, M,. and Subramanyam, K. R. (2007). Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), 623-657. 36. Irvine, H. J., and Lucas, N. (2006). The rational and impact of the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards: the case of the United Arab Emirates. 18th Asian-Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues, 1-22. 37. Irvine, H. (2008). The global institutionalization of financial reporting: the case of the United Arab Emirates. Accounting Forum, 32, 125–142. 38. Joshi, P. L., and Ramadhan, S. (2002). The adoption of international accounting standards by small and closely held companies: CHÍNH SÁCH & THỊ TRƯỜNG TÀI CHÍNH - TIỀN TỆ 17Tạp chí Khoa học & Đào tạo Ngân hàng Số 195- Tháng 8. 2018 evidence from Bahrain. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 429-440. 39. Lobo, G.J. & Song I. (1989). The incremental information in SFAS No. 33 income disclosures over historical cost income and its cash and accrual components. The Accounting Review, 64(2), 329-343 40. Lundqvist, P., Marton, J., Pettersson, A. K., and Rehnberg, P. (2008). IFRS implementation in listed companies – identification of factors leading to inconsistent application. Conference paper, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg University. 41. MacArthur, J. B. (1996). An investigation into the influence of cultural factors in the international lobbying of the International Accounting Standards Committee: The case of E32, Comparability of Financial Statements. The International Journal of Accounting, 31(2), 213-237. 42. Mashayekhi, B., and Mashayekh, S. (2008). Development of accounting in Iran. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 66-86. 43. Muller, K.A, Riedl, E.J., and Sellhorn, T. (2008). Consequences of Voluntary and Mandatory Fair Value Accounting: Evidence Surrounding IFRS Adoption in the EU Real Estate Industry. (No. 09-033). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. 44. Needles Jr., B. E., Ramamoorti, S., and Shelton, S.W. (2002). The role of international auditing in the improvement of international financial reporting. Advances in International Accounting, 15, 181-201. 45. Nobes, C. W. (1998). Toward a general model of reasons for international differences in financial reporting. ABACUS, 34(2), 495-519. 46. Ong, A., Lin W.-Y. & Hsu, H. (2004). Internationalizing accounting standards. The conflict of objectives and constraints. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 46-52 47. Perera, H., and Baydoun, N. (2007). Convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards: the case of Indonesia. Advances in International Accounting, 20, 201–224. 48. Perumpral, S. E., Evans, M., Agarwal, S., and Amenkhienan, F. (2009). The evolution of Indian accounting standards: Its history and current status with regard to International Financial Reporting Standards. Advances in Accounting, 25, 106–111. 49. Prather-Kinsey, J., Jermakowicz, E. K., and Vongphanith, T. (2008). Capital market consequences of European firms’ mandatory adoption of IFRS. Working paper. Conference paper, AAA Anaheim. 50. Rahman, A., Perera, H., and Ganesh, S. (2002). Accounting practice harmony, accounting regulation and firm characteristics. ABACUS, 38(1). 51. Roudaki, J. (2008). Accounting profession and evolution of standard setting in Iran. Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 15, 33-52. 52. Spathis, C., and Geograkopoulou E. (2007). The adoption of IFRS in South Eastern Europe: the case of Greece. Int. J. Financial Services Management, 2(1/2), 50-63. 53. Taylor, M. E., and Jones R. E. (1999). The use of International Accounting Standards terminology, a survey of IAS compliance disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(4), 557-570. 54. Tzovas, C. (2006). Factors influencing a firm’s accounting policy decisions when tax accounting and financial accounting coincide. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 372-386. 55. Zeghal, D., and Mhedhbi, K. (2006). An analysis of the factor affecting the adoption of international accounting standards by developing countries. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 373-386. Thông tin tác giả Phạm Hồng Linh, Thạc sĩ Khoa Ngân hàng, Học viện ngân hàng Email: linhph@hvnh.edu.vn Summary Determinants of the adoption of fair value accounting under International Financial Reporting Standards- A literature review Financial statements disclosed at fair value provide investors with more information when the assets are presented at their real value. This makes financial reporting more transparent to investors. Studies and statistics showed that the more capital markets develop, the more widely the disclosure of financial statements at fair value is. The high risk associated with the operations of banks and other financial institutions requires the adoption of stringent regulations, thus, making the industry earlier pay attention to fair value. The article reviews studies of factors that influence the adoption of fair value accounting, which include economic environment, legal and tax environment, professional environment, business environment, cultural environment, and international environment. The paper can be used to build research models as well as to assist governments in the adoption process of International Financial Reporting Standards. Key word: fair value, financial statements, IFRS. Linh Hong Pham, MEc. Banking Faculty, Banking Academy
File đính kèm:
- cac_nhan_to_anh_huong_den_viec_ap_dung_ke_toan_gia_tri_hop_l.pdf